Information To The Police And Their Powers To Investigate MCQ Quiz - Objective Question with Answer for Information To The Police And Their Powers To Investigate - Download Free PDF

The correct answer is option 1.

Key Points

• Shambhu Das v. State of Assam AIR 2010 SC 3300:
  • The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that an F.I.R under section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not a substantial piece of evidence.
  • Its primary function is to contradict or corroborate the informant's statements during the trial.
  • This case clarifies the limited evidentiary value of the F.I.R, emphasizing its role in corroboration rather than as standalone proof.

Additional Information

• Mir Md. Omar v. State of West Bengal AIR 1989 SC 1875:
  • This case primarily deals with the evidentiary value of a confession made to the police and not the specific usage of an F.I.R under section 154.
  • The decision focuses on the admissibility and reliability of such confessions in criminal proceedings.
• Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P (1994) 4 SCC 260:
  • This case addresses the issue of illegal detention and the rights of an arrested person.
  • The Supreme Court laid down guidelines to prevent arbitrary arrests, emphasizing the need for procedural safeguards.
• None of the above:
  • This option is incorrect because the specific ruling regarding the limited evidentiary value of an F.I.R under section 154 is found in Shambhu Das v. State of Assam.
  • The other cases do not address the same legal point about the F.I.R.

The correct answer is option 1.

Key Points

• Shambhu Das v. State of Assam AIR 2010 SC 3300:
  • The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that an F.I.R under section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not a substantial piece of evidence.
  • Its primary function is to contradict or corroborate the informant's statements during the trial.
  • This case clarifies the limited evidentiary value of the F.I.R, emphasizing its role in corroboration rather than as standalone proof.

Additional Information

• Mir Md. Omar v. State of West Bengal AIR 1989 SC 1875:
  • This case primarily deals with the evidentiary value of a confession made to the police and not the specific usage of an F.I.R under section 154.
  • The decision focuses on the admissibility and reliability of such confessions in criminal proceedings.
• Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P (1994) 4 SCC 260:
  • This case addresses the issue of illegal detention and the rights of an arrested person.
  • The Supreme Court laid down guidelines to prevent arbitrary arrests, emphasizing the need for procedural safeguards.
• None of the above:
  • This option is incorrect because the specific ruling regarding the limited evidentiary value of an F.I.R under section 154 is found in Shambhu Das v. State of Assam.
  • The other cases do not address the same legal point about the F.I.R.