General Exceptions MCQ Quiz in বাংলা - Objective Question with Answer for General Exceptions - বিনামূল্যে ডাউনলোড করুন [PDF]

Last updated on Mar 16, 2025

পাওয়া General Exceptions उत्तरे आणि तपशीलवार उपायांसह एकाधिक निवड प्रश्न (MCQ क्विझ). এই বিনামূল্যে ডাউনলোড করুন General Exceptions MCQ কুইজ পিডিএফ এবং আপনার আসন্ন পরীক্ষার জন্য প্রস্তুত করুন যেমন ব্যাঙ্কিং, এসএসসি, রেলওয়ে, ইউপিএসসি, রাজ্য পিএসসি।

Latest General Exceptions MCQ Objective Questions

Top General Exceptions MCQ Objective Questions

General Exceptions Question 1:

Under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which of the following is NOT covered by the right of private defense?

  1.  A person defending themselves from an unprovoked assault.
  2.  A person defending their property from a criminal trespass
  3. A person using force to stop a burglary in progress.
  4.  A person using excessive force to retaliate for an earlier theft.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 4 :  A person using excessive force to retaliate for an earlier theft.

General Exceptions Question 1 Detailed Solution

The Correct Answer is option 4.

Key Points 

Explanation:

  • The right of private defense under Section 35 is available to defend against immediate offenses. The right does not justify retaliation or the use of excessive force for past offenses. It applies to defense during the occurrence of the offense, not for past incidents.

General Exceptions Question 2:

What is a key restriction when exercising the right of private defense of body and property under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?

  1. The use of force must be excessive to prevent the harm.
  2. The person defending must be part of the crime.
  3. The defense must be proportional to the threat faced.
  4. The right of private defense is available only if the attack is premeditated.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : The defense must be proportional to the threat faced.

General Exceptions Question 2 Detailed Solution

​The Correct Answer is option 3.

Key Points 

Explanation:

  •  The right of private defense is limited by proportionality. The force used in defense must be reasonable and proportionate to the threat faced, whether it is to protect oneself, another person, or property.

General Exceptions Question 3:

 According to Section 36, when a person attacks another due to a misconception (e.g., mistaking them for a thief), what is the legal standing?

  1. The attacker is guilty of an offense, and the victim can exercise the right of private defense.
  2. The attacker is not guilty of an offense, but the victim can still exercise the right of private defense.
  3. The attacker is not guilty, and the victim cannot exercise private defense.
  4. The attacker is guilty, and the victim cannot defend themselves.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 2 : The attacker is not guilty of an offense, but the victim can still exercise the right of private defense.

General Exceptions Question 3 Detailed Solution

​The Correct Answer is option 2. 

Key Points

 

Explanation:

  • If a person attacks another due to a misconception, as described in the example with Z thinking A is a house-breaker, the attacker is not guilty of any offense due to their mistaken belief. Nevertheless, the victim still has the right to defend themselves as if the attacker’s act were an offense.

General Exceptions Question 4:

As per Section 43(e) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the right of private defence against house-breaking after sunset and before sunrise continues until:

  1. The offender enters the house
  2. The house-trespass caused by house-breaking continues
  3.  The owner informs the police
  4. The offender apologizes

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 2 : The house-trespass caused by house-breaking continues

General Exceptions Question 4 Detailed Solution

The correct answer is Option 2 

Key PointsAccording to Section 43(e) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the right of private defence against house-breaking at night continues as long as the trespass resulting from the house-breaking continues. This allows the defender to act until the intruder completely stops their illegal presence in the house.

The right of private defence of property:

(a) Begins when there is a reasonable apprehension of danger to the property;
(b) Against theft, continues until the offender retreats with the property, public authorities intervene, or the property is recovered;
(c) Against robbery, persists as long as the offender causes or attempts to cause death, hurt, or wrongful restraint, or as long as the fear of immediate death, hurt, or personal restraint exists;
(d) Against criminal trespass or mischief, remains in effect as long as the offender continues committing the act;
(e) Against house-breaking occurring between sunset and sunrise, lasts as long as the resulting house trespass continues.

General Exceptions Question 5:

X, while driving an ambulance at high speed to save a critical patient, swerves and damages Y’s parked vehicle. He knew there was a chance of causing damage but acted to avoid greater harm to the patient. Under Section 19 of the BNS, X:

  1. Is guilty because he had knowledge his act might cause harm
  2. Is guilty because the vehicle was damaged
  3. Has committed no offence as he acted in good faith to prevent greater harm
  4. Is guilty because he failed to inform the police

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : Has committed no offence as he acted in good faith to prevent greater harm

General Exceptions Question 5 Detailed Solution

The correct answer is Has committed no offence as he acted in good faith to prevent greater harm

Key Points

  • As per Section 19 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, an act is not an offence merely because the person had knowledge that it might cause harm, if:
    • The act was done without criminal intent,
    • In good faith, and
    • To prevent or avoid greater harm to person or property.
  • In this case, X acted in good faith to save a life, knowing the risk but aiming to prevent a more serious consequence. Hence, no offence is committed.

General Exceptions Question 6:

According to Section 43(c) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the right of private defence against robbery continues as long as the offender causes or attempts to cause _______________ or as long as the fear of instant death or hurt continues.

  1.  Psychological distress
  2. Financial loss
  3. Death, hurt, or wrongful restraint
  4. Verbal threats

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : Death, hurt, or wrongful restraint

General Exceptions Question 6 Detailed Solution

The correct answer is Death, hurt, or wrongful restraint

Key Points As per Section 43(c) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the right of private defence against robbery lasts as long as the robber continues to cause or attempt to cause:

  • Death
  • Hurt
  • Wrongful restraint
  • Additionally, the defence remains valid if there is still a fear of instant death or harm, ensuring the victim's safety.

 

  • The right of private defence of property:

    (a) Begins when there is a reasonable apprehension of danger to the property;
    (b) Against theft, continues until the offender retreats with the property, public authorities intervene, or the property is recovered;
    (c) Against robbery, persists as long as the offender causes or attempts to cause death, hurt, or wrongful restraint, or as long as the fear of immediate death, hurt, or personal restraint exists;
    (d) Against criminal trespass or mischief, remains in effect as long as the offender continues committing the act;
    (e) Against house-breaking occurring between sunset and sunrise, lasts as long as the resulting house-trespass continues.

General Exceptions Question 7:

Under Section 36 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, what is the primary reason a person might have the right of private defense against an act that would otherwise not be an offense?

  1. The person who is attacked has the right to retaliate at any time
  2. The act is committed by someone who is unsound of mind, intoxicated, or acting under a misconception.
  3. The attacker is acting without provocation, even if they understand the consequences.
  4. The victim is allowed to defend themselves only if they are legally allowed to do so

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 2 : The act is committed by someone who is unsound of mind, intoxicated, or acting under a misconception.

General Exceptions Question 7 Detailed Solution

​The Correct Answer is  option 2.

Key Points

 Explanation:

  • Section 36 allows the right of private defense to be exercised when the act being committed would be an offense if done by someone of sound mind or sober condition, but is not considered an offense due to factors such as unsoundness of mind, intoxication, or misconception on the part of the attacker

General Exceptions Question 8:

According to Section 18 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, an act is not an offence if it is done:

  1. Unintentionally during an unlawful act
  2. Intentionally but with good motive
  3. By accident or misfortune, during a lawful act, done lawfully and with proper care
  4. Without following any legal procedure

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : By accident or misfortune, during a lawful act, done lawfully and with proper care

General Exceptions Question 8 Detailed Solution

The correct answer is By accident or misfortune, during a lawful act, done lawfully and with proper care

Key Points

  • Section 18 of the BNS, 2023 provides that: "Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, and without any criminal intention or knowledge, in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner, by lawful means, and with proper care and caution."
  • This means:
    • The act must be accidental (not intentional),
    • It must occur while doing something lawful,
    • It must be done lawfully and with due care,
    • There must be no criminal intent or knowledge.
  • ​Such acts are excused from criminal liability under this section.

General Exceptions Question 9:

According to Section 37 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, when is there no right of private defense? 

  1.  When a person is being attacked without any provocation
  2. When there is no reasonable apprehension of death or grievous hurt.
  3. When a public servant acts under the authority of law, even if the act is not strictly justified by law.
  4.  When a person defends themselves against a public servant acting in good faith.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : When a public servant acts under the authority of law, even if the act is not strictly justified by law.

General Exceptions Question 9 Detailed Solution

The Correct Answer is option 3. 

Key Points

Explanation:

  • Section 37(1)(a) specifies that the right of private defense does not exist against an act done by a public servant acting in good faith under the color of his office, even if that act is not strictly justifiable by law, as long as it does not reasonably cause the apprehension of death or grievous hurt.

General Exceptions Question 10:

Under Section 37(1)(c) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, when is the right of private defense not applicable?

  1. When the act of defense is excessive in relation to the threat.
  2. When there is time to have recourse to the protection of public authorities.
  3. When the threat involves minor harm or property damage.
  4. When the person is unaware of any threat and is caught off-guard.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 2 : When there is time to have recourse to the protection of public authorities.

General Exceptions Question 10 Detailed Solution

The Correct Answer is option 2.

Key Points

Explanation:

  • Section 37(1)(c) removes the right of private defense when there is time to seek help from public authorities. The individual must not resort to private defense if help from the authorities can be obtained.
Get Free Access Now
Hot Links: teen patti 500 bonus teen patti sweet teen patti royal - 3 patti teen patti bonus teen patti master 2024