Section 189 BNS plays a vital role in ensuring public order and tranquillity under the newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This section redefines the framework for dealing with group actions that threaten peace by establishing legal boundaries around the idea of unlawful assembly . The law has moved away from outdated colonial structures under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and embraced modern clarity, as reflected in Section 189 of BNS.

The section primarily addresses collective behavior that involves the use of criminal force to resist law enforcement or obstruct public servants, among other objectives. The provision criminalizes such conduct and brings into its ambit not just participants, but also those who organize, support, or shelter these activities. As a cornerstone of the unlawful assembly section in BNS, this law ensures legal recourse against mobs and riots, helping authorities maintain peace without infringing on the right to assemble peacefully. Explore other important Judiciary Notes.

Section 189 BNS

Unlawful Assembly

1. An assembly of five or more persons is designated an “unlawful assembly”, if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is
   1. to overawe by criminal force, or show of criminal force, the Central Government or any State Government or Parliament or the Legislature of any State, or any public servant in the exercise of the lawful power of such public servant; or
   2. to resist the execution of any law, or of any legal process; or
   3. to commit any mischief or criminal trespass, or other offence; or
   4. by means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to any person, to take or obtain possession of any property, or to deprive any person of the enjoyment of a right of way, or of the use of water or other incorporeal right of which he is in possession or enjoyment, or to enforce any right or supposed right; or
   5. by means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to compel any person to do what he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do what he is legally entitled to do.
      Explanation: An assembly which was not unlawful when it assembled, may subsequently become an unlawful assembly.
2. Whoever, being aware of facts which render any assembly an unlawful assembly, intentionally joins that assembly, or continues in it, is said to be a member of an unlawful assembly and such member shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.
3. Whoever joins or continues in an unlawful assembly, knowing that such unlawful assembly has been commanded in the manner prescribed by law to disperse, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
4. Whoever, being armed with any deadly weapon, or with anything which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, is a member of an unlawful assembly, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
5. Whoever knowingly joins or continues in any assembly of five or more persons likely to cause a disturbance of the public peace, after such assembly has been lawfully commanded to disperse, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.
   
   Explanation: If the assembly is an unlawful assembly within the meaning of sub-section (1), the offender shall be punishable under sub-section (3).
6. Whoever hires or engages, or employs, or promotes, or connives at the hiring, engagement or employment of any person to join or become a member of any unlawful assembly, shall be punishable as a member of such unlawful assembly, and for any offence which may be committed by any such person as a member of such unlawful assembly in pursuance of such hiring, engagement or employment, in the same manner as if he had been a member of such unlawful assembly, or himself had committed such offence.
7. Whoever harbours, receives or assembles, in any house or premises in his occupation or charge, or under his control any persons knowing that such persons have been hired, engaged or employed, or are about to be hired, engaged or employed, to join or become members of an unlawful assembly, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.
8. Whoever is engaged, or hired, or offers or attempts to be hired or engaged, to do or assist in doing any of the acts specified in sub-section (1), shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.
9. Whoever, being so engaged or hired as referred to in sub-section (8), goes armed, or engages or offers to go armed, with any deadly weapon or with anything which used as a weapon of offence is likely to cause death, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Note: "The information provided above has been sourced from the official website, i.e., Indian Code. While the content has been presented here for reference, no modifications have been made to the original laws and orders" 

Free Download PDF on Section 189 BNS

Section 189 BNS defines and regulates situations where five or more individuals assemble with an unlawful objective. The law focuses on assemblies where the shared intent may include obstructing law enforcement, intimidating public officials, or committing offenses such as trespassing or property seizure.

A key legal standard is the "common object" of the group. Even individuals who do not directly participate in violence can be held liable if they knowingly remain part of such a group. The clause also applies to those who incite or recruit members—thus broadening the scope of liability.

This law replaces corresponding IPC provisions like Sections 141–145, streamlining their language and increasing enforceability. When a group refuses to disperse after being ordered by authorities, they can be penalized under section 189 2 BNS. Armed participation invites stricter punishment under section 189 4 BNS.

Under section 189 BNS punishment, offenders may face imprisonment up to six months, a fine, or both. As for section 189 2 BNS bailable or non bailable, the offense is non-bailable and cognizable—allowing arrest without a warrant and making bail discretionary.

In sum, Section 189 BNS deals with both direct and indirect contributors to group violence or unrest. This ensures comprehensive accountability and deters the misuse of collective force in civil society.

Enhanced Interpretation with Integrated Analysis

Section 189 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,2023 is designed to address offences against public tranquillity by criminalizing group behavior with unlawful intent. A gathering of five or more people becomes illegal when its common purpose includes:

• Overawing public authorities through force,
• Resisting legal enforcement,
• Committing crimes like mischief or trespass,
• Seizing property or denying lawful access to rights,
• Forcing someone to act unlawfully or abstain from lawful acts.

This framework, outlined under BNS 189 1, ensures that participants, organizers, and supporters of such assemblies are all legally accountable.

Punishments and Legal Classification

Under section 189 BNS punishment, individuals may be punished with:

• Up to six months’ imprisonment,
• A monetary fine, or
• Both.

Refusing to disperse upon legal order attracts penalties under 189 2 BNS in IPC section equivalent, now clarified in BNS 2023 section 189 2.

The offense is cognizable, allowing arrest without warrant, and non-bailable, meaning bail is not guaranteed—answering the legal concern around 189 BNS bailable or non bailable.

Relevance to New Legal Structure

Section 189 BNS is a cornerstone of India’s modern criminal law, working alongside the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) to streamline and simplify justice delivery. It replaces older IPC clauses with clearer definitions and penalties suited to today’s socio-political realities.

Section 189 BNS Essential Elements

To invoke Section 189 BNS, the following criteria must be met:

• Assembly of at least five persons,
• Common unlawful purpose (e.g., to resist the law or use force),
• Intentional participation (not accidental presence),
• Refusal to disperse when lawfully ordered,
• Knowledge of the group’s objective.

Violation of dispersal orders or joining armed, even if not actively violent, can bring consequences under section 189 2 BNS bailable or non bailable and section 189 4 BNS. These elements define the core of the unlawful assembly section 189 BNS.

Section 189 BNS 2023 aims to deter group-based violence by clearly outlining who can be held liable and for what actions. The law’s broad scope:

• Covers organizers, instigators, armed participants, and harborers,
   
• Applies to both pre-planned and spontaneous assemblies,
   
• Allows enforcement even when the unlawful intent is still forming.

Compared to unlawful assembly under IPC, the new section eliminates ambiguity and increases deterrence, especially under terms like section 189 BNS deals with.

Comparison with IPC 

Before BNS, similar conduct was covered under Indian Penal Code (IPC). The transition to Section 189 BNS preserved the structure while fitting into the reformed legal framework under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Section 189 BNS Judicial Interpretation

The Indian judiciary emphasizes active intent in matters of unlawful assembly. In Kuldip Singh v State of Punjab, it was held that simple presence is not enough; active participation is necessary.

In State of Bihar v Shankar Gope, the Patna High Court explained that each participant must share a common illegal intent. This is vital when interpreting section 189 BNS punishment in line with section 189 4 BNS for armed participants.

These rulings protect lawful assembly under Article 19 while enabling courts to penalize those using collective violence.

Section 189 BNS Landmark Cases

The following landmark cases under IPC remain instructive for interpreting Section 189 BNS:

1. Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab (1962) 2 SCR 3 : The Supreme Court emphasized in the case of Kartar Singh that mere presence at the scene of an unlawful assembly does not constitute an offense unless the individual shares the common object of the assembly.
 

2. Dharampal v. State of U.P. (AIR 1975 SC 1917): The Court held that to convict someone under Section 149 IPC, it must be proven that the person was a member of an unlawful assembly with a shared common object, and that an offense was committed in pursuit of that object.
 

3. Amerika Rai & Others v. State of Bihar (2011) 4 SCC 677 : The Supreme Court clarified that for vicarious liability under Section 149 IPC, active participation with a shared common object is necessary. Mere presence without such intent does not attract liability.

Section 189 BNS Legal Impact 

The introduction of Section 189 BNS reflects India’s commitment to a structured legal framework. It empowers the state to handle modern threats posed by mass gatherings, political agitations, and violent protests.

The provision extends beyond traditional definitions under unlawful assembly under IPC, offering clarity and wider reach. Its classification as non-bailable and cognizable (see 189 BNS bailable or non bailable) discourages misuse.

Whether during communal tension or disruptive protests, the law ensures action against not just frontline rioters but also those who orchestrate, arm, or shelter them—thus tackling unlawful assemblies from every angle.

Conclusion 

Section 189 BNS is a robust legal measure under the reformed Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. It retains the democratic essence of peaceful assembly while drawing firm boundaries around violence, coercion, and obstruction of justice.

From enhanced definitions in BNS 189 1, to updated legal statuses in section 1892 BNS, the law responds to today’s civic challenges. Queries like section 189 2 BNS bailable or non bailable or section 189 BNS punishment are now answered through unambiguous provisions.

In replacing outdated unlawful assembly under IPC clauses, Section 189 of BNS creates a more just, responsive, and modern legal framework. For legal scholars, civil activists, and citizens alike, this law sets a clear guide on what is legally permissible in public expression and protest.