In the question below two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III are given. You have to assume everything in the statements to be true, then consider the the three conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond reasonable doubt from the information given in the statements.

Statements:

I. Water has no shape, has volume.

II. The knowledge is like water, flowed from one side to other.

Conclusions:

I. The knowledge is interdisciplinary.

II. The knowledge is bound within a specific area.

III. The knowledge influences the core of mental activity directly.

The solution is based on analyzing the metaphorical comparison of knowledge to water, which suggests flexibility, adaptability, and the capacity to flow or transfer across areas.

Conclusion I, "The knowledge is interdisciplinary," aligns with this metaphorical representation, suggesting knowledge is not confined to a single domain but can be applied across different fields, much like water taking the shape of its container.

Conclusion II, "The knowledge is bound within a specific area," contradicts the analogy of water's ability to flow and adapt, implying that knowledge is not rigidly confined.

Conclusion III, "The knowledge influences the core of mental activity directly," does not directly follow from the statements provided, which focus more on the nature of knowledge's spread rather than its effect on mental activity.

Given the analysis Only conclusion I follows.

Hence, the correct answer is "Only conclusion I follows.".