In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.

Statement:

For admission to MA (Social Work) course, the condition of prior experience in social work may be relaxed by the Admission Committee to the best candidates.

Conclusion:

I. Some students of MA (Social Work) will have prior experience of social work.

II. Some MA (Social Work) students will not have prior experience in social work.

Concept: We have to examine the given statement and then analyse the conclusions to judge if the given conclusions are following the statements or not.

Statement: 

For admission to MA (Social Work) course, the condition of prior experience in social work may be relaxed by the Admission Committee to the best candidates.

Explanation: 

The statement says that if the candidate is best then required or prior experience can be reduced for his admission in MA(social Work).

Conclusion:

I. Some students of MA (Social Work) will have prior experience of social work.

Those students who are not best will have to take prior experience.

So, Conclusion I is follows.

II. Some MA (Social Work) students will not have prior experience in social work.

The top students will not be having prior experience.

So, Conclusion I is follows.

As it can be seen both statements are true.

Therefore, the correct answer should be "Conclusion I and Conclusion II both follow."